Patrick explores moral obstacles in IVF, embryo adoption, and surrogacy as callers voice conflicts between personal intentions and Catholic doctrine; callers weigh the ethics of rescuing frozen embryos, question gestational distinctions, and challenge the boundaries of technology and tradition. He draws from Church teaching, documents like Dignitas Personae and Donum Vitae, and sharp analogies, sometimes drifting into uncertainty about potential future rulings.

• Patrick continues his conversation with Robert from the end of the last hour about IVF and adopting embryos (00:39)
• Joe – I don’t think Jesus would let frozen embryos lead a life of doom and let them expire. (13:09)
• Deanna – How come Abraham and Sarah were not punished for surrogacy? (19:27)
• Andrew – I don’t usually disagree with you, but I don’t see how saving embryos is surrogacy. (25:23)
• Leslie – I wish instead of Catholics using IVF that we address infertility issues. (38:02)
• Leo – Kidnapping the kids is more analogous to taking someone else’s children from someone else’s conception. Also, I am concerned that when they select the embryo to be born, they damage it in the process. (40:25)
• Nick – This conversation reminds me of how incest was permitted in Genesis. (43:33)
• Pam – What is the difference between a mother using an incubator and a surrogate mother? (46:35)

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS